I thought this would be a good as time as any to reflect on how this experiment is going (see the “What’s the purpose of this blog?” post). I’m quite sanguine, for the most part. Basically, I’m doing exploratory research on the phenomenon of recitation, but instead of amassing jottings and comments on paper or on a computer file, I’ve been recording the research on this blog. One advantage of doing this on a blog is that it compels one to further explore, process and compose a useful synopsis and comment on the material, rather than just collect a mass of citations and quotations, the significance of which might be forgotten in the process of collecting evidence.
A second advantage is that, with tools like Categories and Tags and hyperlinking, you can manipulate and access your research materials in ways not possible in more traditional formats. Although, in a sense, a blog can be viewed as a variation on the most traditional of research tools: the index-card system, where research is written down on index cards and then filed according to whatever cataloging system the researcher has devised. The blog, unlike the index-card mode of research, is much easier to use and can deal with unforeseen changes, additions, revisions in research trajectories, in a way that would be a nightmare if one were using the index-card system. (Blog posts can also be revised, supplemented, new tags and categories added, without wielding a big eraser or having to cram some new information along the side of an index card in vision-cripppling minuscule script.) Which leads me to ponder: How many scholars became the prisoners of, because of the effort they put into, their indexing-card systems, thereby limiting their intellectual mobility because of a preconceived system they had devised for structuring their data? Read the rest of this entry »
Posted by Jason 